Humanitarian Action Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Humanitarian Action - Assignment Example Hieronymi main logic or deduction from his research is that interests and values based approaches to humanitarian action are not entirely mutually exclusive. However the effective combination of the two vices can significantly strengthen the arguments that are formulated in humanitarian’s action favor. Hieronymi supports this logic by referring to the humanitarian imperative. This is the value and ability engrained deep into the human soul that enables him to clearly distinguish between right and wrong.1 He argues that in everyday life, human beings are faced with various moral dilemmas. These dilemmas can be of varying nature and human beings are therefore placed in a precarious position where they have to decide whether to take action or not. For example when one witness an instance of child cruelty, there is the obvious urge to take intervene. However in certain circumstances, moral consideration may be out rightly rejected. This may be due to various political philosophies , for example in states under dictatorship where human cruelty may be a common norm. This is obviously a clear violation of human values and principles. Hieronymi uses various historical situations in the past to further support his argument. Hieronymi also elaborates on the interests that humanitarian crises touch and which inadvertly stimulates human beings to take action. The first one is the nature and values of the universe that the human being so closely covets. The second interest is the ‘importing’ of the suffering and trouble risk. The final interest is the aftermath costs of the crises, which would have been avoided had prevention measures been effected. Hieronymi further argues that when deciding whether to take humanitarian action, the interests of both the victims and the individuals or organizations of the people taking the action must be taken into consideration. There should therefore be a convergence of both interests. Hieronymi concludes his logic by s tating that values and interests are therefore the two most significant vices that govern humanitarian action consideration. David Rieff’s point of view in his publication A Bed for the Night is that humanitarian action may pose more problems if solved realistically. This is an opinion which clearly concurs with other critics like Waal, Michael Maren, Bernard Hours, and Peter Uvin. He argues that humanitarian action is a futile enterprise whose effects may be fatal and this makes him unique from other literature writers because he first acknowledges the complexity of the issue call for a proper preparedness. His writing seeks to attack the common approach of relief programs and advocacy initiatives that are increasingly being applied by humanitarian agencies.  

Roles Reversal of the Democratic and Republican Party Research Paper

Roles Reversal of the Democratic and Republican Party - Research Paper Example Currently, democrats can be described as the real stewards of the status quo while Republicans are now struggling to bring changes in the United States. As much as the two parties have undergone modifications such that they appear to have reversed their positions, the royalty from the public has not changed. By this, I mean that those regions that were loyal to the conservative Republican remain loyal to the somehow radical Republican while the region royal to the radical Democratic Party remain loyal to the less liberal Democratic Party. However, it is irrefutable that certain aspects remain unchanged in either of the two parties. This paper argues that the Republican and Democratic parties have reversed their roles but most people remain loyal to either of the party because they do not know the history of the Democratic and Republican parties. Background of Republican and Democratic Parties Democratic Party origin can be traced back to the period before America attained independenc e from British. It was enhanced by Anti federalist factions. On the contrary, anti-slavery objectors instituted the Republican Party in 1854. However, Republican Party remained less popular until the Election of Abraham Lincoln who was the first Republican Party. During its foundation, Democratic Party was grounded on liberalism ideology while the Republican Party was based on conservatism. The different ideologies are depicted in personal and economic issues (Meyers web; Berg-Andersson Web). Liberalism advocate for individual autonomy over morality in addition to favoring economic equality over freedom. Liberalism also supports government actions to reduce poverty by redistributing the wealth. On the other hand, conservatism approves of personal morality over freedom and advocate for economic freedom over equality. Conservatives promote traditional principles such as strong patriotism (Parla Web; ProCon Web). Additionally, conservatism supports the idea that the government should n ot involve itself in role such as helping individuals and opposes attempts to redistribute income between the wealthy and the poverty-stricken. The ideologies also dictated the possible ways of reacting to different issues with Republicans being more likely to put economic freedom above equality while Democrats were likely to put equality over economic freedom (Berg-Andersson Web; Parla Web). Democrats are considered to be on the left side of the political spectrum and commonly referred to as the leftist while the republican are considered to be on the right. With time, the two parties have been characterized by change in their ideological platforms and specifics. Currently, neither of the two parties fully represents the same ideologies it did during the initial stages of the foundation. Additionally, the parties have undergone drastic changes in the past four decades, which has been portrayed by the change in the leadership styles by recent presidencies from each of the two partie s (Meyers Web; ProCon Web). The Democrats were initially a States Rights party, and strongly supported slavery. On the other hand, the Republicans started as an abolitionist party, whose members strongly opposed slavery. Currently, Republicans advocate and support States Rights, and are against any attempt by the government to increase taxes. On the other hand, Democrats prefer to use Federal funds and power to improve the lives of the poor as demonstrated by